March 9, 2022

Nationwide cohort study finds Cesarean delivery does not appear to be a risk factor for ADHD after adjusting for familial confounding

Previous meta-analyses have found an association between cesarean delivery (CD) and subsequent ADHD in children delivered in that manner. Some have theorized that by bypassing the birth canal, children delivered via CD may acquire their first microbiota from the hospital environment rather than from their mothers, which could disturb the normal development of the nervous system, including the brain.

Nevertheless, earlier studies have not fully explored the role of confounding factors.

A team of Swedish researchers availed themselves of the country's all-encompassing system of national population and health care registers to examine a cohort of over a 1.1 million single births from 1990 through 2003 and followed up through 2013.

They distinguished between planned CD and intrapartum (i.e., during the act of birth) CD. The latter is performed in response to complications with childbirth. This distinction could matter both because of different levels of exposure to the maternal gut microbiota, and because "intrapartum CD is often the result of complications during pregnancy (e.g., preeclampsia) or delivery (e.g., fetal distress), which could affect brain development."

Of 1,179,341 individuals, 1,048,838 were delivered vaginally, 59,514 were delivered by planned CD, and 70,989 were delivered by intrapartum CD.

After adjusting for the child's year of birth, gestational age, age of mother and father at birth, parity, mother's highest education level at birth, maternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal and paternal history of psychiatric disorders, maternal hypertension, maternal diabetes, maternal infections during pregnancy, fetal MAL presentation, large for gestational age, polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, preeclampsia, and pelvic disproportion, children born by planned CD were 17% more likely to have ADHD.

After adjusting for all previously listed variables plus placenta disorders, dystocia failed induction, and fetal distress, children born by intrapartum CD were 10% more likely to have ADHD.

So far, the analysis confirmed results from previous meta-analyses.

But by exploring such a large cohort, it also became possible to compare ADHD prevalence, not only among unrelated individuals, but also among siblings and cousins, and thereby assess the role of confounders arising from genetics or shared environment.

Whether between full siblings or full maternal cousins, the associations between both types of CD and subsequent ADHD became weak and statistically non-significant.

The authors concluded, "The findings of this study suggest that the association between CD and increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in the children was most likely explained by unmeasured familial confounding."

Tianyang Zhang, Gustaf Brander, Ängla Mantel, RalfKuja-Halkola, Olof Stephansson, Zheng Chang, Henrik Larsson, David Mataix-Cols, Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, "Assessment of Cesarean Delivery and neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Disorders in the Children of population-Based Swedish Birth Cohort,". JAMA Network Open(2020)4(3):e210837,https://doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0837.

Related posts

No items found.

Meta-analysis Finds Little Evidence in Support of Game-based Digital Interventions for ADHD

ADHD treatment usually involves a combination of medication and behavioral therapy. However, medication can cause side effects, adherence problems, and resistance from patients or caregivers. 

Numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have evaluated the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on ADHD. With little research specifically examining game-based interventions for children and adolescents with ADHD or conducting meta-analyses to quantify their treatment effectiveness, a Korean study team performed a systematic search of the peer-reviewed medical literature to do just that.  

The Study: 

To be included, studies had to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved children and adolescents diagnosed with ADHD. The team excluded RCTs that included participants with psychiatric conditions other than ADHD.  

Eight studies met these standards. Four had a high risk of bias.  

Meta-analysis of four RCTs with a combined total of 481 participants reported no significant improvements in either working memory or inhibition from game-based digital interventions relative to controls. 

Likewise, meta-analysis of three RCTs encompassing 160 children and adolescents found no significant improvement in shifting tasks relative to controls. 

And meta-analysis of two RCTs combining 131 participants reported no significant gains in initiating, planning, organizing, and monitoring abilities, nor in emotional control

The only positive results were from two RCTs with only 90 total participants that indicated some improvement in visuospatial short-term memory and visuospatial working memory.  

There was no indication of effect size, because the team used mean differences instead of standardized mean differences.  

Conclusion:

The team concluded, “The meta-analysis revealed that game-based interventions significantly improved cognitive functions: (a) visuospatial short-term memory … and (b) visuospatial working memory … However, effects on behavioral aspects such as inhibition and monitoring … were not statistically significant, suggesting limited behavioral improvement following the interventions.” 

Simply put, the current evidence does not support the effectiveness of game-based interventions in improving behavioral symptoms of ADHD in children and adolescents. The only positive results were from two studies with a small combined sample size, which does not qualify as a genuine meta-analysis. All the other meta-analyses performed with larger sample sizes reported no benefits. 

Understanding Teen Health and Well-being in ADHD: A Fresh Perspective from the CDC

Recent research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) highlights distinct health and social-emotional challenges faced by teens diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This study, published in the Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, offers critical insights directly from the teens themselves, providing a unique view often missed when relying solely on parent or clinical reports. 

Researchers analyzed nationally representative data from July 2021 through December 2022, comparing self-reported experiences of teens aged 12 to 17 with and without ADHD. Approximately 10% of teenagers had an ADHD diagnosis, and the findings reveal specific areas where teens with ADHD face notable difficulties. 

Teenagers with ADHD reported significantly higher rates of bullying victimization and struggles in making friends compared to their peers. Surprisingly, they were less likely to report a lack of peer support, suggesting complexities in how they perceive friendships and social networks. The study underscores the importance of directly engaging teens in assessing their social relationships, rather than solely relying on parental perspectives. 

Sleep difficulties emerged as another critical issue for teens with ADHD. About 80% reported problems like difficulty waking up and irregular wake times, markedly higher than their non-ADHD counterparts. Such disruptions can exacerbate attention difficulties and emotional regulation issues, further complicating daily life for these teens. 

Excessive screen time also stood out, with nearly two-thirds of teens with ADHD spending over four hours daily on screens, excluding schoolwork. This high screen usage is concerning, given its potential negative impact on physical and mental health, including sleep quality and social interactions. 

Notably, the study found no significant differences in physical activity levels or concerns about weight between teens with and without ADHD. This finding contrasts with previous studies that have highlighted lower physical activity among children with ADHD, suggesting the need for continued research on how physical activity is measured and encouraged in this population. 

The study’s authors emphasize the importance of health promotion interventions tailored specifically for teens with ADHD. By directly engaging teens and considering their unique perspectives, interventions can better address social-emotional well-being and healthy lifestyle behaviors, ultimately improving long-term outcomes for this vulnerable group. 

Overall, this research provides compelling evidence for healthcare providers, educators, and families to focus on supporting teens with ADHD in areas of social skills, sleep hygiene, and healthy screen time habits. Such targeted support can significantly enhance the quality of life and health outcomes for adolescents navigating the challenges of ADHD. 

Meta-analysis Reports No Significant Evidence for Efficacy of Neuromechanistic Treatments for Adult ADHD

The Background on ADHD Treatments, rTMS and tDCS:

Methylphenidate is known as the gold-standard treatment for ADHD, increasing dopamine concentrations and helping to focus. However, these psychostimulants may be less well-tolerated in adults. Adverse effects include decreased appetite, nausea, racing heartbeat, restlessness, nervousness, and insomnia. 

Neurofeedback is a non-pharmaceutical treatment that combines cognitive behavioral therapy techniques like conditioning and positive reinforcement with electroencephalography (EEG) feedback. Electrodes are placed on specific brain areas, guiding patients to regulate their brainwave activity. 

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses electromagnetism to induce an electric field by passing a magnetic field through the scalp. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on the other hand, directly applies an electric current through the scalp. Both repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and tDCS primarily target the outermost layers of neurons, as they are non-invasive methods. Nevertheless, both techniques are believed to affect deeper layers through interconnected neuronal networks.  

The Study:

A French research team conducted a systematic search of the peer-reviewed medical literature to perform a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of these experimental treatment techniques. 

Eight studies – four using rTMS and another four using tDCS – met the inclusion criteria. Studies had to be randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and had to involve multiple sessions of treatment. Participants had to be adults previously diagnosed with ADHD.  

Outcomes were measured through self-rated scales, neuropsychological tests, and electrophysiological pre-post evaluations. 

Separate meta-analyses of the four tDCS RCTs combining 154 participants and of the four rTMS RCTs encompassing 149 participants likewise reported no significant improvements. In all cases variation in outcomes between studies was moderate, and there were no signs of publication bias. 

The Conclusion on Neuromechanistic Treatments for ADHD:

Meta-analysis of all eight studies with a combined total of 421 participants reported no significant improvements over controls. Narrowing down to studies that used sham controls likewise produced no significant improvements. So, despite the title of this study, these neuromechanistic treatments do not appear to be the future of treatment for adult ADHD.